Tristan Sloughter has posted a blog post about how Steve Ballmer and Microsoft want to extort us Linux folk for the rights to use free software. In response, Tristan suggests we start a campaign of mailing monopoloy money to Steven Ballmer. I am definitely all for it! Only problem is, I am not just going to handover my hard earned Monopoly Money! Good Hasbro has PDF's on their site to print some out! I recommend printing the 500's. Just to make sure you pay enough to get Microsoft off your back.
Money:
http://www.hasbro.com/monopoly/pl/page.treasurechest/dn/default.cfm
Address:
Microsoft Corporation
c/o Steven Ballmer
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052-7329
Spread the word!
Also on reddit.
Showing posts with label free. Show all posts
Showing posts with label free. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Sensationalism in the GNU/Linux world
Today I came across the following blog post entitled Is Ubuntu Set to become Non-free?
Basically they complain how Ubuntu is going to want you to use proprietary drivers for using the default composite manager. The thing that bugs me is that Ubuntu is already non-free. Their own philosophy(which the author even states) specifically says they allow for specific cases of having non-free software. To me, you can't be slightly free or non-free, you are either free, or you are not, it is just that simple.
Try telling that to digg readers though. It is funny to go through their comments on this article, and read many of them say "No", Ubuntu is not going to become non-free.
I think Ubuntu and Debian are both partially to blame here. They pretend they are "free" when really they are not, so now a mass of people believe that is what having a free distribution means. More importantly though, sensationalist posters who are just merely looking to grab attention of the digg crowd are to blame. Why someone would goto the trouble to distort facts and ramble about misleadings just to get a reaction from the digg crowd is beyond me. I guess some people really are just that narcissistic.
Basically they complain how Ubuntu is going to want you to use proprietary drivers for using the default composite manager. The thing that bugs me is that Ubuntu is already non-free. Their own philosophy(which the author even states) specifically says they allow for specific cases of having non-free software. To me, you can't be slightly free or non-free, you are either free, or you are not, it is just that simple.
Try telling that to digg readers though. It is funny to go through their comments on this article, and read many of them say "No", Ubuntu is not going to become non-free.
I think Ubuntu and Debian are both partially to blame here. They pretend they are "free" when really they are not, so now a mass of people believe that is what having a free distribution means. More importantly though, sensationalist posters who are just merely looking to grab attention of the digg crowd are to blame. Why someone would goto the trouble to distort facts and ramble about misleadings just to get a reaction from the digg crowd is beyond me. I guess some people really are just that narcissistic.
Monday, November 13, 2006
Richard Stallman Talk
The pictures for Richard Stallman's talk is now up on my flickr page. You can view all of them here: http://flickr.com/photos/diginux/sets/72157594369802498/
Also, if you would like to hear the audio of the speech, go here: http://www.chicagolug.org/uploads/4/49/RMS.ogg
Also, if you would like to hear the audio of the speech, go here: http://www.chicagolug.org/uploads/4/49/RMS.ogg
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)